| Previous | Contents | Next |
This chapter presents a brief overview of the National Homelessness Initiative, including its rationale, objectives, scope, and program components.
On December 16, 1999, Cabinet approved a three-year demonstration initiative to contribute to reducing homelessness in Canada. Overall the Government of Canada is investing $753 million over three years to help alleviate and prevent homelessness across Canada. The National Homelessness Initiative has at its core the following set of strategic objectives:
These objectives are pursued through seven components8 managed through various federal departments and Crown Corporations.
While most of the components are managed as separate initiatives, the NHI was intended to promote a coordinated federal effort to address homelessness based on common objectives and compatible approaches.
The SCPI, the largest component of the NHI ($305 million), is based on the premise that communities are best placed to devise effective strategies to both prevent and reduce homelessness locally. Therefore the SCPI is designed to support communities in building the capacity, resources and incentives to develop and implement comprehensive strategies.
The SCPI is guided by the following operational objectives:
The SCPI made funds available to a total of 61 communities across Canada. Eighty percent of the funding was allocated to ten communities that were identified through consultations as having the most serious problems with absolute homelessness. These are: Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg, Toronto, Hamilton, Ottawa, Montreal, Quebec City, and Halifax. The remaining 20% of the funding was allocated to another 51 communities that had a demonstrable need to address homelessness.
In order to obtain SCPI funds that had been allocated to them, communities were required to develop a community plan to address homelessness. The plans incorporated a number of elements including the plan objectives and the identification of funding priorities to address service gaps. A community plan was submitted and approved for all 61 communities designated as eligible for SCPI funding.10
Communities were able to choose between an entity or shared administrative model for implementing the SCPI. In the community entity model , an incorporated organization receives SCPI funding and is responsible for coordinating the development and implementation of the community plan, including deciding which projects will be funded. The community entity is responsible for ensuring an inclusive community planning process and transparency in the decision making and administrative processes and practices. The entity is also accountable for funding decisions. In the shared delivery model , HRDC staff, in partnership with community groups co-ordinate the development of an inclusive community plan and, based on recommendations from community groups, negotiate funding arrangements with project proponents. In this model, a community advisory board recommends acceptance of individual SCPI projects, but the Minister must give final approval.
Aboriginal people are significantly over-represented in the homeless population across Canada. NHI resources ($59 million) were made available to urban Aboriginal communities through the Urban Aboriginal Strategy, an existing federal mechanism that brings together federal departments through the Regional Councils of Senior Federal Officials.
The Aboriginal Affairs Secretariat of the Privy Council Office serves as the main coordinating body for the Aboriginal Homelessness funding. However, it was decided that the most effective way to channel the resources to Aboriginal communities was through the terms of the existing Aboriginal Human Resources Development Agreements (AHRDAs). As such, the responsibility for the administration of the Aboriginal Homelessness funding was given to regional HRDC offices, which managed the AHRDAs. Unlike the SCPI, funding was not limited to identified urban areas.
In SCPI-designated communities, Aboriginal Homelessness projects are intended to be a part of the community plan, but the funds remain separate from the SCPI allocation for that community.
On April 5, 2001, Treasury Board approved an amendment to the SCPI terms and conditions to allow for an expansion of Aboriginal Homelessness funding to activities that have a non-labour market focus. This amendment was brought forward as a result of the need for more flexibility that would allow Aboriginal communities to direct Aboriginal Homelessness funds toward homelessness projects.
Youth constitute a significant component of the homeless in Canada. In most city studies, they account for 10%-30% of the homeless population. Under the NHI, $59 million over three years was allocated to address homelessness among youth. This component is delivered through existing HRDC Youth Employment Strategy (YES) programs.
Canada's YES is designed to help young people make the transition into the labour market. HRDC regional and local staff who operate YES programs, under the NHI, are able to fund projects that have a youth employment aspect, but which can be seen to contribute to the alleviation of homelessness or the risk of homelessness.
On April 5, 2001, Treasury Board approved an amendment to the SCPI terms and conditions to allow for an expansion to youth activities that have a non-labour market focus. This provides an alternative mechanism through which Youth Homelessness funds under the NHI can be allocated.
8A more detailed description of all seven NHI components and the logic models developed for both the NHI and the SCPI are provided in the NHI Evaluation Framework. Back
9The NSH defines a continuum of supports as "a holistic approach to addressing the needs of homeless individuals within a community plan. It includes all supports and services that would be needed to assist a homeless person or someone at risk of becoming homeless to become self-sufficient, where possible" (Glossary of Terms). The continuum includes homelessness prevention services, emergency shelter, outreach, transitional housing and support services (such as addictions counselling and employment training). Back
10On Prince Edward Island, it was decided that Charlottetown and Summerside would develop a joint homelessness plan, consequently there were only 60 community plans submitted and approved. Back
| Previous | Contents | Next |